Monday, 24 Aug 2026
Subscribe
States Top Leading News States Top Leading News
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Videos
    • Local News
    • Editorial
    • Business
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Finance
    • General
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Technology
    • Politics
    • World
    • Press Releases
    • Shop
  • Services
    • Press Release Distribution
    • Biz Directory
    • Video Press Release
  • Career
  • About
    • Corrections Policy
    • Staff Directory
    • Published Pages
    • Legal Disclaimer
  • Contact
Font ResizerAa
STL.NewsSTL.News
Search
  • Home
  • Categories
    • Videos
    • Local News
    • Editorial
    • Business
    • Education
    • Entertainment
    • Finance
    • General
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Technology
    • Politics
    • World
    • Press Releases
    • Shop
  • Services
    • Press Release Distribution
    • Biz Directory
    • Video Press Release
  • Career
  • About
    • Corrections Policy
    • Staff Directory
    • Published Pages
    • Legal Disclaimer
  • Contact
Have an existing account? Sign In
Follow US
© States Top Leading News. All Rights Reserved.

Home » Politics » MO Supreme Court Ruling – Reproductive Freedom

Politics

MO Supreme Court Ruling – Reproductive Freedom

Martin Smith
Last updated: September 10, 2024 3:34 pm
Martin Smith - Editor in Chief 50 Views
Share
MO Supreme Court Ruling - Reproductive Freedom
MO Supreme Court Ruling - Reproductive Freedom
SHARE

Missouri Supreme Court Reverses Ruling That Invalidated “Reproductive Freedom” Ballot Initiative

Missouri Amendment 3 Remains on the November Ballot After Missouri Supreme Court Challenge – Reproductive Freedom

JEFFERSON CITY, MO (STL.News) Reproductive Freedom – On September 10, 2024, the Missouri Supreme Court reversed a lower court judgment finding that the initiative petition for Missouri’s proposed Amendment 3 had violated state law.  The high court ruling allows Missouri’s Amendment 3, also known as the “Right to Reproductive Freedom Initiative,” to appear on the November general election ballot.  Earlier today, Thomas More Society attorneys argued the challenge to Amendment 3 before the Missouri Supreme Court.

Contents
Missouri Supreme Court Reverses Ruling That Invalidated “Reproductive Freedom” Ballot InitiativeMissouri Amendment 3 Remains on the November Ballot After Missouri Supreme Court Challenge – Reproductive FreedomAbout Thomas More Society

Mary Catherine Martin, Thomas More Society Senior Counsel, reacted:

“The Missouri Supreme Court’s decision to allow Amendment 3 to remain on the November ballot is a failure to protect voters by not upholding state laws that ensure voters are fully informed going into the ballot box.  It is deeply unfortunate the court decided to ignore laws that protect voters in order to satisfy pro-abortion activists who intentionally omitted critical information from the initiative petition.  This ruling takes away important protections from all Missouri citizens to serve the well-funded political goals of a few.  Missouri’s Amendment 3 will have far-reaching implications on the state’s abortion laws and well beyond, repealing dozens of laws that protect the unborn, pregnant women, parents, and children—a reality that the initiative campaign intentionally hid from voters.  We implore Missourians to research and study the text and effects of Amendment 3 before going to the voting booth.”

Read the Court Order, issued September 10, 2024, by the Missouri Supreme Court, in Coleman, et al. v. Ashcroft, here.

Read the background on Coleman et al. v. Ashcroft on the Thomas More Society case page, here.

About Thomas More Society

Thomas More Society is a national not-for-profit law firm dedicated to restoring respect in law for life, family, and freedom. Headquartered in Chicago and with offices across the country, Thomas More Society fosters support for these causes by providing high-quality pro bono legal services from local trial courts to the United States Supreme Court.  For more information, please visit thomasmoresociety.org.

TAGGED:Missouri
Share This Article
Twitter Email Copy Link Print
By Martin Smith Editor in Chief
Follow:
Martin Smith is the founder and Editor in Chief of STL.News, an independent digital news publication owned and operated by St. Louis Media, LLC. He founded STL.News in 2016 and oversees its editorial direction and digital publishing operations. His coverage includes business, financial markets, securities litigation, government and regulatory developments, legal news, and St. Louis-area businesses and economic activity.
Best Webhost

Your Trusted Source for Accurate and Timely Updates!

Our commitment to accuracy, impartiality, and delivering breaking news as it happens has earned us the trust of a vast audience. Stay ahead with real-time updates on the latest events, trends.
FacebookLike
TwitterFollow
PinterestPin
InstagramFollow
Google NewsFollow
LinkedInFollow

Popular Posts

Understanding Online Loans: Key Considerations for Borrowers

(STL.News) Online Loans - In today's fast-paced digital world, accessing financial services online has become…

By Martin Smith

U.S. Inflation Report and Its Impact on the Dow Jones

U.S. Inflation Report and Its Impact on the Dow Jones: A Comprehensive Market Analysis ST.…

By Martin Smith
Business Loans
States Top Leading News States Top Leading News
Facebook Instagram Pinterest Apple Google

About STL.News

STL.News is an independent digital news publication owned and operated by St. Louis Media, LLC. Founded in 2016, our mission is to provide accurate, timely and accessible local, national and international news, with an emphasis on St. Louis, business and financial markets. Visit our Google page.

  • Marty@STLMedia.Agency
  • 417-529-1133
  • 36 Four Seasons Shopping Center # 310 Chesterfield, Missouri 63017 United States

© 2026 St. Louis Media, LLC dba STL.News. All Rights Reserved.

adbanner
AdBlock Detected
Our site is an advertising supported site. Please whitelist to support our site.
Okay, I'll Whitelist
Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?