WASHINGTON, June 11 (STL.News) – United States President Donald Trump said on Thursday he wants to take over Iran’s oil infrastructure hub, Kharg Island, but he expressed uncertainty regarding whether the American public has the stomach for a major escalation in the ongoing war. Trump announced the United States will hit Iran again with intensified strikes, although he indicated he would prefer not to target essential bridges and power plants.
The president’s comments arrive amid worsening hostilities between the United States and Iran that have undermined prospects for a swift end to the conflict. Following the exchange of attacks for a second consecutive day, Trump promised a larger and more powerful military response during the Thursday night period. Despite these plans for increased strikes, the president maintained that the United States is still engaged in talks with Iran to reach a potential deal.
Seizing Strategic Energy Assets
Kharg Island serves as a critical node for Iran, processing approximately 90 percent of the country’s crude oil exports. Control over this specific hub would effectively place the majority of Iran’s oil and gas market under United States oversight. Trump drew parallels to previous operations in Venezuela, suggesting that seizing such energy assets could successfully strip the Iranian regime of its primary funding streams.
While the president expressed a clear preference for this tactical move, his remarks highlighted a significant internal conflict regarding the appetite for further military engagement. During an interview on the Fox & Friends program, the president addressed the potential for a ground operation to secure the facility.
“My preference has always been – take Kharg Island … my preference would be that. I don’t know that America has the stomach for it,” Trump stated.

Escalation and Diplomatic Hurdles
The current military situation remains volatile, with both nations trading air attacks after a ceasefire originally agreed upon in April struggled to hold. While the White House has not yet clarified the status of that ceasefire, reports from Iranian sources and Western officials suggest that indirect talks regarding a preliminary peace deal had recently intensified. Trump expressed frustration with both the media coverage of the war and the incalcitrance shown by Iranian leadership.
The conflict has resulted in significant casualties, particularly within Iran and Lebanon, while simultaneously driving up global oil prices. Since the United States and Israel initiated heavy air strikes on February 28, the war has severely impacted international energy stability. The island, which sits roughly 15 miles off the Iranian mainland coast, remains a focal point due to its vulnerability and economic importance. Although the United States military previously struck military installations on the island in March, it intentionally avoided hitting the critical energy infrastructure at that time.
The president’s latest declarations signal a marked shift toward potentially targeting or occupying state-run energy facilities if diplomatic efforts fail to yield a permanent agreement. Negotiators remain focused on breaking the stalemate to extend the fragile ceasefire, even as the rhetoric from Washington becomes increasingly bellicose. The global energy markets have reacted to these developments, with Brent crude futures reflecting the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the future of Iranian exports.