United States Attorney’s Office Resolves Lawsuit

United States Attorney’s Office Resolves Lawsuit Against BayPort Credit Union for Violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act

ALEXANDRIA, VA (STL.News) BayPort Credit Union (“BayPort”), located in Newport News, has agreed to pay nearly $110,000 to settle allegations that it violated the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (SCRA) by charging excessive interest on servicemembers’ loans and other credit products and repossessing servicemembers’ vehicles without court orders.

The SCRA requires creditors to reduce the interest rate on servicemembers’ financial obligations, including retail installment sales contracts, to 6% in certain circumstances.  The SCRA also prohibits repossessing a motor vehicle from a servicemember during military service without a court order, as long as the servicemember made a deposit or installment payment on the loan before entering military service.

The settlement, which must be approved by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, resolves a lawsuit filed today by the Department of Justice.  The lawsuit alleges that BayPort unlawfully charged interest in excess of 6% to 21 servicemembers who qualified for and sought SCRA interest rate benefits.  In at least one instance, BayPort told a servicemember that reducing the interest rate would increase her monthly payment.  The lawsuit also alleges that BayPort unlawfully repossessed three servicemembers’ motor vehicles without court orders.  In at least one of those cases, BayPort knew about the borrower’s military service and repossessed the vehicle from a military base.

Under the terms of today’s settlement, BayPort must pay nearly $70,000 to the affected servicemembers.  Additionally, BayPort must pay $40,000 to the United States as a civil penalty.  The agreement also requires BayPort to revise its policies and procedures to prevent future SCRA violations and provide SCRA training to its employees.

“Entering military service can create financial hardships for our servicemembers who make incredible sacrifices for our nation’s security,” said Jessica D. Aber, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia.  “This consent order helps ensure that these men and women are not disadvantaged by their military service and that servicemembers’ rights are protected going forward.”

“This case is just the latest example of the Justice Department’s steadfast commitment to safeguarding the rights of servicemembers, who make so many sacrifices in defending our country,” said Assistant Attorney General Kristen Clarke of the Department’s Civil Rights Division.  “We will continue to vigorously enforce the protections to which servicemembers are entitled under federal law, including their right to a 6% interest rate cap on loans and a right not to have their car repossessed without a court order.”

The resolutions obtained in this matter were the result of a coordinated effort between the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia and the United States Department of Justice Civil Rights Division’s Housing and Civil Enforcement Section.  The matter was investigated by Assistant U.S. Attorney Deirdre G. Brou and Trial Attorney Alan Martinson.  The civil claims settled by this SCRA agreement are allegations only; there has been no determination of civil liability.

SOURCE: USDOJ.Today