Carson City, NV – Yesterday, Nevada Attorney General Adam Paul Laxalt filed a lawsuit against pharmaceutical company Purdue Pharma L.P. and its affiliates, which manufacture OxyContin and other opioids. The lawsuit alleges that Purdue engaged in deceptive marketing regarding the risks and benefits of prescription opioids, fueling Nevada’s opioid epidemic and leading to the opioid overdose death of Nevadans.
The lawsuit, filed by the Office of the Nevada Attorney General’s Bureau of Consumer Protection, alleges that Purdue violated the Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices Act through deceptive promotional activities and materials that falsely denied or minimized the risks of addiction, trivialized the pain management uses, and overstated the benefits of opioids. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Purdue has:
- Minimized the risks and overstated the benefits of the long-term use of opioids;
- Downplayed the serious risk of addiction by claiming that signs of addiction are merely the result of under-treated pain;
- Advanced misleading statements on the efficacy of the use of opioids on a person’s quality of life;
- Denied or failed to disclose the greater risks of opioid use at higher doses;
- Exaggerated the effectiveness of abuse deterrent opioids to prevent abuse and addiction;
- Misleadingly promoted OxyContin as providing a full 12 hours of pain relief which it consistently does not; and
- Overstated the effectiveness of doctors’ ability to manage patients’ addiction.
“Purdue’s deception lined the pockets of its owners and led to the deaths and hospitalization of thousands of Nevadans,” said Laxalt. “Since the release of OxyContin, Purdue has engaged in an extensive, well-crafted and highly targeted deceptive marketing campaign to spread false and misleading messages to health care professionals and patients in Nevada. Purdue must be held accountable for its actions and its role in Nevada’s opioid epidemic.”
While at this time, Nevada has only filed against Purdue, it is continuing to investigate other opioid manufacturers and distributors with the larger opioids multistate group. Additionally, Nevada and the other litigating states continue to engage in ongoing settlement discussions with Purdue and other companies.
In 2012, on a national level, providers wrote enough opioid prescriptions for every adult American to have a bottle of pills. The opioid epidemic exists in all counties in Nevada. In 2016, Nevada’s per capita prescription rate for opioids was 87/100 residents. Opioidrelated hospitalizations have increased from 2010 to 2016 by 136 percent in emergency room encounters and 84 percent in inpatient admissions. Even with a slight decline in the number of opioid-related deaths from 2010 to 2016, 85 percent of all opioid-related deaths in Nevada were deemed accidents.
AG Laxalt’s lawsuit seeks civil penalties and damages for reimbursement and treatment, and seeks to cease Purdue’s unlawful promotion of opioids on behalf of the State as a whole and the municipalities and counties.
A copy of the filed complaint is ATTACHED.
Question: it is understandable why AGs pursue manufacturers because most have deep financial resources, however, who is responsible for creating the demand of opioid’s? Who writes the prescriptions indirectly creating the demand, which manufacturers fill that demand with their supply? There are possibly more industries/professions responsible for this social disaster. Read more articles about opioids on STL.News relating to this EPIDEMIC.
SOURCE: news provided by AG.NV.GOV on May 15, 2018